

Growth
2026-10-29 · 7 min read
Sapun Lamichhane
Founder & CEO of Arcetis
A common pattern: a business spends NPR 50,000-100,000 on a marketing push around a launch or festival season, sees a bump, and then stops entirely until the next big event. Marketing built this way never compounds - each push starts from zero again, rather than building on momentum, an audience, or data from the last round.
The fix is thinking in a continuous, smaller monthly commitment rather than occasional large bursts. A steady NPR 20,000-30,000 a month, consistently applied and adjusted based on what is working, generally outperforms the same total annual budget spent in two or three disconnected sprints.
This pattern is especially common around Dashain and Tihar, when many businesses spend heavily for a few weeks and then go quiet for the rest of the year - the festival spend captures attention in the moment, but without any follow-up activity, most of that attention evaporates within weeks rather than turning into repeat customers. A smaller, year-round budget almost always produces more durable growth than a single large seasonal burst.
“Most wasted marketing budget in Nepal is not wasted on bad ads - it is wasted on having no plan at all.”
It is tempting to be on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and run Google Ads all at once, especially when a business feels behind. In practice, a small team spread across four platforms usually produces mediocre content everywhere rather than strong content anywhere, and a budget split that thin rarely generates enough volume on any single channel to actually learn what works.
Pick the one or two channels where your actual customers are most active and invest real effort there before expanding. A business doing Facebook and Google Ads well will typically outperform the same business doing five channels poorly, on the same total budget.
The instinct to be everywhere usually comes from seeing a competitor's presence on a new platform and feeling pressure to match it immediately - but matching a competitor's platform choice without matching their budget, team, or content quality on that platform rarely produces the same results, and often just divides your own limited resources further.
A surprising number of Nepal businesses run Google Ads or Meta Ads for months without Google Analytics 4 properly installed, without a conversion event tracking form submissions, and without a simple way to ask new customers how they heard about the business. Without this, there is no honest way to know whether the campaign is working - decisions get made on gut feeling instead of data.
Setting up basic tracking takes a few hours once and should be done before any paid campaign launches, not retrofitted months later after budget has already been spent blind.
Even simple tracking matters more than it seems - something as basic as a unique phone number or a dedicated landing page per campaign can tell you which specific ad or post actually drove a customer through the door, without needing any advanced technical setup at all.
Driving paid traffic to a slow, confusing, or outdated website is one of the most common ways to waste an ad budget in Nepal - the ad does its job bringing a visitor, and the website loses them before they take any action. This shows up as a high cost per lead or sale that gets blamed on the ad platform, when the actual problem is upstream.
Before increasing ad spend, it is worth honestly auditing the website itself - load speed, mobile experience, clarity of the offer, and ease of contacting the business - since fixing these is often cheaper than the extra ad spend needed to compensate for a weak site.
This mistake is compounded when a business concludes afterward that "ads don't work for us" and abandons performance marketing entirely, when the actual lesson should have been that the website needed attention before the ad budget did - a conclusion that gets missed without honestly auditing both pieces separately. A ten-minute review of the site on a phone, before blaming the ad platform, usually answers the question.
Choosing an agency or freelancer purely on lowest monthly fee, without checking their actual track record or process, is a frequent and costly mistake - a management fee below roughly NPR 15,000-20,000 a month rarely covers enough real time to manage a campaign properly, which shows up later as stagnant or declining performance. Equally risky is accepting guarantees no honest provider should make - a specific ranking position, a guaranteed number of leads, or guaranteed sales - since search and ad platforms do not allow any agency to promise these outcomes.
Ask for monthly reporting with real numbers, not just screenshots of pretty graphs, a written scope of what is included, and references you can actually verify. A provider confident in their work will not hesitate to provide these.
A related trap is switching agencies every few months chasing a better promise, without giving any single engagement the three to six months most channels genuinely need to show reliable results - this churn resets progress repeatedly and often costs more in the long run than staying the course with one competent provider.
Before spending on anything, write down what specific outcome you want - calls, form fills, sales - how you will measure it, which one or two channels you will focus on first, and a monthly budget you can sustain for at least three months. This alone prevents most of the mistakes above, because it forces tracking, focus, and consistency before a single rupee is spent.
If building and managing this consistently is more than your team has bandwidth for, that ongoing management - tracking, reporting, and adjusting month to month - is the core of what an agency like Arcetis is actually paid to do, rather than just running ads and hoping.
Writing this down does not need to be formal - a single page with these four answers, revisited monthly, is enough to keep a small business's marketing grounded in what is actually happening rather than what feels like it should be happening. Most of these mistakes share the same root cause: skipping the planning step because spending the money feels like progress on its own.
Ask for a monthly report with real numbers - cost per lead, conversion rate, actual traffic trends - not just engagement screenshots or vanity metrics. A good agency can explain, in plain language, what changed this month and why, and should welcome questions about their reasoning rather than being vague about results.
Running without any tracking in place. Without knowing which channel, ad, or post actually produced a real inquiry or sale, every other decision - budget, platform choice, messaging - is a guess dressed up as a strategy.
It depends on the business and goals, but a sustainable starting point for a small business is often NPR 30,000-80,000 a month combined across management fees and ad spend, focused on one or two channels rather than spread across everything at once. Engagements can start smaller, from around NPR 20,000 a month, but should be scoped honestly to what that budget can actually achieve.