

Growth
2026-10-18 · 9 min read
Sapun Lamichhane
Founder & CEO of Arcetis
For everyday communication, most Nepalis reach for WhatsApp, Viber, or Facebook Messenger long before email - that is simply the dominant habit, and it is reasonable to ask whether building an email list and newsletter is worth the effort when a business could instead build a WhatsApp broadcast list or a Messenger audience that customers actually check daily. This is a legitimate question, not a settled one, and the honest answer varies a lot by business type rather than having one clean verdict either way.
The honest answer depends heavily on the type of business. For a business-to-consumer brand relying on impulse or casual browsing, email often underperforms chat apps in Nepal. For B2B companies, e-commerce stores with repeat customers, and any business where the relationship involves formal communication (invoices, confirmations, documentation), email remains genuinely useful and, in some cases, essential. The mistake is applying one blanket answer across every kind of business rather than assessing it against the specific customer relationship involved, which varies far more between industries in Nepal than the generic "email is dead" or "email always works" takes tend to acknowledge.
It is also worth noting that these channels are not mutually exclusive - a business can maintain both a WhatsApp broadcast list for quick, casual updates and an email list for more formal or detailed communication, using each for what it does best rather than treating the decision as an either-or choice between the two.
“Email marketing in Nepal is not dead - it is just not for every business, and the businesses it is not for are usually the ones trying hardest to make it work.”
Email has one major structural advantage chat apps do not: a business owns the list and the relationship outright, with no platform in between that can change its algorithm, restrict messaging limits, or ban an account. WhatsApp and Messenger both impose real restrictions on bulk or marketing-style messaging to reduce spam, which limits how reliably a business can reach its full list whenever it wants - email has no equivalent throttling as long as it is sent to people who opted in and the sender maintains a reasonable reputation.
Email also remains the default channel for anything that needs a paper trail - order confirmations, receipts, formal business communication - which chat apps handle less gracefully and which customers themselves often still expect to land in an inbox rather than a chat thread.
This ownership advantage becomes especially visible during a platform disruption - when a messaging app changes its policies, restricts business accounts, or experiences downtime, a business with an email list can still reach its audience through a completely independent channel, which is a form of resilience worth having even for a business that primarily relies on chat apps day to day.
A large share of small Nepali businesses send marketing or transactional email from a free Gmail or similar address rather than a properly configured business domain, which badly hurts deliverability - emails from free addresses sent in bulk are far more likely to land in spam, regardless of how good the content is. Setting up a business domain with proper authentication (SPF, DKIM records) and sending through a dedicated email platform rather than a personal inbox is a basic fix that most local businesses have simply never done.
This is worth emphasizing because it means a lot of businesses that concluded "email doesn't work for us in Nepal" never actually tested email marketing properly - they tested poorly configured email that was landing in spam before a single recipient ever saw it.
It is worth testing deliverability directly rather than assuming it is fine - sending a test campaign and checking whether it actually lands in a personal Gmail or Outlook inbox versus a spam or promotions folder gives a concrete answer, and many businesses discover a real problem only after doing this check for the first time, having assumed for months or years that their emails were being seen.
Buying email lists is both largely ineffective and a fast way to damage sender reputation - purchased lists are full of people who never opted in, generate high spam complaint rates, and can get a sending domain blacklisted, which then hurts deliverability even for legitimate future emails. The only approach that actually works is building a list from people who gave an email address willingly - at checkout, through a signup form, or in exchange for something genuinely useful like a discount or a resource.
Realistic open rates for a well-maintained, opted-in list in Nepal commonly fall somewhere in the 15-30% range depending on industry and list quality, broadly consistent with international norms, though a poorly maintained or purchased list will perform far worse than that.
A double opt-in process, where a new subscriber confirms their email address after signing up, adds a small amount of friction but meaningfully improves list quality and deliverability over time, since it filters out mistyped addresses and people who signed up without real intent to receive future emails.
Email marketing tends to make the most sense for an e-commerce store with repeat customers (abandoned cart reminders, post-purchase follow-ups, restock notices), a B2B company selling to other businesses, or any business already collecting customer email addresses as part of normal operations. It makes less sense as a first channel for a brand-new local business with no existing list and limited time, where a WhatsApp broadcast list or an active Facebook presence will likely reach the same customers with less setup effort.
For businesses where it fits, Arcetis sets up email marketing as part of a broader digital presence rather than a bolt-on afterthought - proper domain authentication and a genuinely opted-in list, rather than the under-configured approach that gives email marketing its undeserved reputation for not working in Nepal.
For businesses unsure where they fall, a reasonable test is low-cost: collect emails for two to three months through normal operations without any dedicated campaign effort, then send a single well-written email to that list and see what response it gets, before committing to a larger ongoing program either way. That small, low-risk test usually answers the "does this work for us" question far more reliably than guessing from general advice.
It works well for businesses with repeat customers or formal communication needs, such as e-commerce stores and B2B companies, especially once sent from a properly authenticated business domain rather than a free personal email address. It is a weaker first channel for a brand-new local business with no existing customer list.
The most common cause for Nepali businesses is sending bulk email from a free or improperly authenticated address without SPF and DKIM records set up on a business domain. This alone can cause otherwise good content to never reach the inbox.
No. Purchased lists perform poorly and can damage a sending domain's reputation through high spam complaints, which then hurts deliverability for all future emails, including to people who did opt in legitimately.