

Growth
2026-10-24 · 8 min read
Sapun Lamichhane
Founder & CEO of Arcetis
A junior to mid-level marketing hire in Kathmandu or Pokhara - someone capable of handling social media, basic content, and simple ad management - typically costs somewhere in the range of NPR 25,000 to 50,000 a month in salary, more for someone with genuine paid advertising or SEO experience. On top of salary, add the cost of tools and software subscriptions, the time a manager spends training and directing someone who may not yet have deep specialist experience, and the ongoing risk of turnover - when that one person leaves, so does most of the institutional knowledge of what has and has not worked.
“In-house buys you availability and no one else wins, outsourced buys you a wider skill set and someone else's infrastructure. Most growing businesses eventually need a version of both.”
Agency retainers in Nepal for a single channel typically run from around NPR 15,000 to 60,000 a month, with multi-channel management running NPR 30,000 to 80,000 or more, separate from ad spend. A freelancer often costs less than either an in-house hire or an agency, but typically covers a narrower set of skills and offers less redundancy if they become unavailable.
What this buys you that a single in-house hire usually cannot is a wider bench of specialist skill - someone who genuinely understands Google Ads bidding strategy is often not the same person who is good at writing social content or building a website, and an agency spreads that specialist knowledge across a team rather than concentrating it in one person's current skill level.
With in-house, you are generally limited to the skill ceiling of whoever you hired - if they are strong at content but weak at paid ads, that weakness becomes your business's weakness until you hire again. Turnover risk is real and underestimated; losing your one marketing person can mean a genuine gap in execution for weeks while you search for a replacement.
With outsourced, you typically get less of the "in the room" availability and context that an in-house person has by default - an agency managing several clients cannot sit in on every internal meeting or absorb every small shift in your business the way someone at your desk every day can. Response time on urgent requests can also be slower than walking over to someone's desk.
A common and often sensible middle path is hiring one in-house person to handle daily execution, content, and customer-facing communication, while using an agency or specialist freelancer for the more technical, specialist work - paid ad strategy, SEO, or website development - where deep expertise matters more than daily availability. This gives you a consistent internal presence while still accessing specialist skill you could not reasonably expect one generalist hire to have across every channel.
Very early-stage or low-budget businesses often cannot justify either a dedicated in-house hire or a full agency retainer yet, and are better served by the founder handling basics directly plus a narrow, specific freelance engagement for one task. Growing businesses with steady revenue and a genuine need for daily content and customer response usually benefit from the hybrid model. Larger, more established businesses with enough volume to justify a full marketing function eventually build out an in-house team, often still supported by specialist outside help for the most technical channels.
The honest answer depends less on company size than on how much daily, hands-on presence your business genuinely needs versus how much specialist, technical skill it needs applied consistently. If you are unsure which side of that line your business is on, that is a conversation worth having before committing to either a salary or a retainer - Arcetis works with businesses at every stage of this decision, including several that use us specifically for the specialist channels while running content and customer communication in-house.
There is no fixed revenue threshold, but a reasonable signal is when marketing-related tasks are consistently taking more than a few hours a week of the founder's time and the business has enough stable revenue to commit to a salary for at least six to twelve months.
Rarely well, especially early in their career. Most people are genuinely strong in one or two of these areas, and a business expecting one generalist hire to excel at all of them is usually setting that person up to be mediocre across the board rather than strong anywhere.
Insist on plain-language monthly reporting that explains results in terms you understand - inquiries and costs, not just impressions and reach - and ask the agency to explain its reasoning for key decisions. An agency unwilling to explain its work in clear terms is a warning sign regardless of how good the results look on paper.