

SEO
2026-10-16 · 10 min read
Sapun Lamichhane
Founder & CEO of Arcetis
The claim is not baseless. AI Overviews at the top of Google results, and the rise of conversational tools people now ask questions directly, mean a meaningful share of searches now end without a click to any website at all - what is commonly called a zero-click search. For a business whose entire SEO strategy was built around generic informational blog posts designed purely to capture search traffic and show ads or affiliate links, this is a genuine threat, and some of that traffic really is gone for good. Several independent studies of search behavior have documented this decline directly, and it is reasonable for a business owner to take that evidence seriously rather than dismiss it outright.
But that is a narrower claim than "SEO is dead." It is closer to "one specific tactic that was already low-value is now worth even less," and conflating the two leads businesses to either panic and abandon search entirely, or dismiss the shift and keep doing what used to work without noticing it has stopped.
It also does not help that some of the loudest voices declaring SEO dead have a reason to want attention elsewhere - a new platform or tool being promoted often benefits from framing an established channel as finished, which is worth keeping in mind when evaluating how confidently a claim like this is being made.
“SEO is not dying - the kind of SEO built entirely around generic "how to" blog posts is dying, and that was always the weakest kind anyway.”
Local and transactional search - "best dentist near me," "furniture shop pokhara," "book hotel chitwan" - remains extremely click-heavy because an AI summary cannot complete a booking, a purchase, or a visit to a physical location on someone's behalf. Google Maps and the local pack continue to drive real foot traffic and calls for Nepali businesses, and that part of search is not going anywhere regardless of how AI answers evolve.
Search volume on Google itself in Nepal also continues to grow as internet penetration increases outside the Kathmandu Valley, and YouTube and image search remain massive, under-optimized channels for most Nepali businesses - video and visual search are arguably growing in relative importance precisely as generic text answers get absorbed by AI summaries.
Nepali businesses with a genuine local footprint - a physical shop, a service area, a specific city they operate in - are structurally well positioned here, because local intent search is exactly the category AI summaries are least able to fully replace. A summary cannot walk into a shop or receive a service; at some point, local search still needs to hand off to a real visit or a real call.
Commodity informational queries - the kind with a short, factual answer that does not require visiting a specific website - are the category most exposed to zero-click loss. "What is the capital of a country," "how many days in a month," that tier of content was never going to hold traffic once AI could answer it directly inline, and Nepali sites that built their SEO entirely on this kind of filler will feel it.
What is replacing the old playbook is content written to be clearly extractable and trustworthy enough to be cited by AI systems themselves - structured, specific, well-sourced answers rather than padded articles - which is a related but distinct discipline, generally discussed separately as generative engine optimization. The throughline is that shallow content written purely to rank is now competing against both other websites and AI systems that can summarize it for free.
There is also a growing expectation that content needs to demonstrate real first-hand experience or expertise to be trusted by both readers and ranking systems, not just repeat facts that are available elsewhere. For a Nepali business, this actually favors genuinely knowledgeable local content - a tour operator describing a specific trek they run themselves, rather than generic travel information copied from elsewhere - over the kind of generic filler content that is now competing directly against AI-generated summaries covering the same ground more efficiently.
For most small and medium Nepali businesses, the practical takeaway is reassuring rather than alarming: local SEO (Google Business Profile, location pages, reviews), genuinely useful and specific content instead of generic filler, and video on YouTube remain worth the investment, and arguably more so as competitors chase AI hype and neglect the basics. SEO budgets in Nepal realistically start from around NPR 30,000 per month and that spend is still well placed on these fundamentals.
What is worth retiring is any strategy built purely around volume - churning out dozens of thin, generic articles hoping a few rank. That approach was already weak before AI answers arrived, and it is now actively counterproductive, since thin content risks getting a site penalized rather than just ignored.
Businesses already running paid search alongside organic SEO should also note that paid listings and AI Overviews currently occupy different space on the results page, meaning a well-run Google Ads campaign is not directly threatened by the same shift affecting organic clicks - though the overall page has become more crowded, which is its own separate challenge worth accounting for in click-through expectations.
Search is not disappearing in Nepal - it is fragmenting across Google, Maps, YouTube, and AI chat interfaces, and a business's visibility now depends on being genuinely well-represented across more than one of these rather than obsessing over a single blue-link ranking. That is more work, not less, but it also rewards the businesses doing real, substantive work over the ones gaming a single channel.
Arcetis has been practicing search-adjacent work in Nepal since 2019 and describes itself as among the first in the country to treat AI answer engines as a distinct discipline worth preparing for specifically - not as a replacement for SEO, but as an addition to it that most agencies in Nepal have not yet started taking seriously.
What is unlikely to change is that being easy to find, clearly described, and well reviewed will continue to matter in some form, regardless of which specific interface - a search results page, a Maps listing, or a chat window - a customer happens to be using in a given year.
No. Local, transactional, and video search remain highly click-driven and unaffected by AI answers in the ways that matter for most small and medium businesses. What should stop is investment in generic, thin informational content built purely for ranking, which was already a weak strategy before AI search accelerated its decline.
Short, factual, commodity answers that an AI system can summarize directly without needing to send a visitor to a website - generic "how to" or definitional content with no local or specific angle is the most exposed category.
Not replacing it - sitting alongside it. Traditional SEO fundamentals like site structure, local listings, and page speed still matter for ranking and for being crawlable in the first place; GEO is an additional, newer discipline focused specifically on being cited inside AI-generated answers.